BC case dealing with variation of restrictions on a gift

BC case dealing with variation of restrictions on a gift

A very interesting case from BC is a must-read for any fundraiser who deals with restricted gifts. The case Boys and Girls Club of Greater Victoria Foundation v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2024 BCSC 442 (CanLII) (PDF) deals with cy pres or variation of a gift and the standard that is necessary. With the world changing so quickly, what might have seemed like a good idea a few decades ago or even last year may not have been such a good idea. Many charities could become insolvent even if they have significant restricted gifts. It is vital to have enough unrestricted gifts to pay for the operations of the charity. But if your charity is prepared to accept a restricted gift It is very important with restricted gifts to have amendment clauses, to have cy pres (variation clauses) and/or to have provisions that a gift agreement is subject to the policies of the charity as amended from time to time. The alternative is that the generous gift may sit and never be used.

Here is a very general summary of the case, but it is well worth reading in its entirety:

  • Boys and Girls Club of Greater Victoria Foundation sought cy pres order relating to a restricted gift for a 98-acre property providing a youth camp and some capital funds for the maintenance of the camp
  • Charity wanted to change restricted gifts to general charitable purposes for Boy and Girls Club Services Society, including after-school programs, nutritious breakfasts for children, etc.
  • Evidence of the trust was from a campaign pamphlet for fundraising
  • Since then, loss of provincial funding, lower usage of camp, property lost its tax exemption, capital improvements were needed, increased operating costs, and while greater need for programs in other areas that have waiting lists
  • Court finds evidence inadequate to establish the impossibility or impracticability of trusts and funds
  • Charity projections – court rejects them – not enough support
  • Shows how much information is required for a cy pres application
  • Even if it was impracticable, it would not turn restricted funds into unrestricted funds – just change as little as possible of the the restrictions/purposes
  • There was no secondary purpose or cy pres clause in fundraising

Here is the text of the case: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2024/2024bcsc442/2024bcsc442.html

By Mark Blumberg, Blumbergs Professional Corporation

Charitable gifting
charitable gifts
cy pres
restricted gifts
restrictions on a gift
Share

Related Posts

Imagen 1

Understanding enterprise architecture and related risks

Enterprise architecture is an important topic to organizations from executives, to IT/business resources, to customers, at all levels and around the globe. This blog post features input from three EA experts, from Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom.

Ron Richard

Read more
Imagen 1

Monitoring controls: The top ten tax controls

At year end, external auditors heading into the tax department do not generally rely on internal controls to reduce testing; a great deal of effort is focused on substantively testing the income tax balances on the financial statements. Tax processes are notoriously manual in nature with numerous adjustments required to manipulate general ledger information into useable tax information. We have compiled a list of the top ten tax controls every company should have in place with the emphasis (as expected) on monitoring controls.

Occasional Contributors

Read more
Imagen 1

Can an employee request access to their personnel and payroll files?

In Canada, employees have the right to access information in their personnel and payroll files, provided that it does not interfere with another employee’s privacy rights.

Jeffrey Sherman, MBA, FCPA, FCA

Read more